We have to rethink John Calipari ... again.

Thomas J. Russo-USA TODAY Sports

This NCAA Tournament continues to churn out classic games. The same can't be said for CBS/TBS's coverage.

The mind is still reeling after Friday night's ridiculous Sweet 16 games.

- The NCAA Tournament could have ended last night, and I think I would have been good with it in that "end on a high note" sense.

- The Virginia Cavaliers, Louisville Cardinals, Iowa State Cyclones and Tennessee Volunteers all are going home after all four games were decided by a total of 14 points.

- While each game involved frantic finishes and key plays, the games collectively really came down to one thing:

- Free throws, gents. Free throws.

- The winners shot 64-of-77 (.831). The losers were 40-of-69 (.580).

- And now, some pundits have to begrudgingly hit delete on their season narratives, instead typing things like

- "John Calipari once again proving youth can be served."

- And ...

- "John Calipari can coach."

- Forget seeds and whether Kentucky is the most under-seeded No. 8 of all time. At this point in the tourney, as a No. 8 or a No. 2, the Wildcats could have had the same resume, and it wouldn't be any less impressive.

- Cue up that "Bill Self v. John Calipari: Who ya got?" conversation that had taken a step back over the past year or so.

- It's one of the things I love most about this Championship: You can't fake it through two weekends. Every team left, including the Dayton Flyers of the world, is playing its best basketball of the season.

- Is it any coincidence that some of the year's best ball has been played after officials got out of the way -- I mean, flat left their whistles at home -- and have allowed the players to decide things?

- I could write 2000 words about the NCAA's abrupt change in officiating for this tournament compared to the season, especially in November and early December.

- I'll keep it to this: Why? What was the point of the "crackdown" if the year's biggest games weren't going to be held to the same (dumb) standards?

- The rules debate did at least lead to some really entertaining television on Friday.

- Doug Gottlieb is much better suited as a color analyst than an on-set debater.

- I think a couple of his points -- including Kentucky's Julius Randle going straight up -- might have been arguable, but he got so frustrated and undone that his delivery came across at times as rushed and babbling.

- And it let a sharky guy like Seth Davis sit back and laugh at him.

- On the CBS/TBS mashup: It probably sounded like a good idea in a meeting or looked okay on paper.

- The awkward, disjointed, not-funny hand-offs between studios -- especially between Ernie Johnson and Greg Gumbel ... These guys are pros. If they can't make it sound reasonable, there's a reason for it.

- Two crowded sets, including a Charles Barkley, perhaps.

- #toomanyvoices

- Maybe it's symbolic, but the overall feel between the two sets felt NBA and college worlds apart.

- Wonder why ...

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bring On The Cats

You must be a member of Bring On The Cats to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bring On The Cats. You should read them.

Join Bring On The Cats

You must be a member of Bring On The Cats to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bring On The Cats. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.