RPI WATCH: 1/29/12
by BracketCat on Jan 30, 2012 12:00 PM CST
in Men's Basketball
Email
PrintRealTimeRPI is now updated with the weekend's results.
Associated Press Ranking = 22
ESPN/USA Today Ranking = 28
Overall Record = 15-5
Big 12 Record = 4-4
Top 50 Record = 3-3
RPI = 41
SOS = 63
Signature Wins (RPI 1-30) = Missouri
Quality Wins (RPI 31-100) = Virginia Tech, Alabama, Long Beach State, Texas
Bad Losses (RPI 101 or greater) = none
- Charleston Southern (14-7, 8-3 Big South) | RPI = 137: Win at Presbyterian (75-64)
- Loyola Chicago (5-16, 0-11 Horizon) | RPI = 302: Loss at Wright State (41-47)
- UMES (4-15, 1-5 MEAC) | RPI = 310: Loss at North Carolina A&T (66-91)
- George Washington (8-13, 3-4 A-10) | RPI = 179: Loss at Fordham (58-63)
- Virginia Tech (12-9, 1-5 ACC) | RPI = 82: Loss at Maryland (69-73)
- West Virginia (15-7, 5-4 Big East) | RPI = 17: Loss at No. 3 Syracuse (61-63)
- North Florida (11-12, 5-5 A-Sun) | RPI = 171: Win at Lipscomb (71-59)
- Alabama (14-7, 3-4 SEC) | RPI = 36: Win over Arkansas (72-66)
- Southern Illinois (7-15, 4-7 MVC) | RPI = 231: Loss at Illinois State (40-60)
- UTEP (10-11, 3-4 C-USA) | RPI = 157: Loss at Houston (76-81 in overtime)
- Long Beach State (16-6, 9-0 Big West) | RPI = 36: Win over Cal State Fullerton (75-61)
- Howard (4-17, 1-7 MEAC) | RPI = 316: Loss at Savannah State (50-71)
- No. 5 Kansas (17-4, 7-1 Big 12) | RPI = 7: Loss at Iowa State (64-72)
- No. 2 Missouri (19-2, 6-2 Big 12) | RPI = 12: Win over Texas Tech (63-50)
- No. 6 Baylor (19-2, 6-2 Big 12) | RPI = 3: Win over Texas (76-71)
- Oklahoma (13-7, 3-5 Big 12) | RPI = 71: Win at No. 22 Kansas State (63-60)
- Texas (13-8, 3-5 Big 12) | RPI = 63: Loss at No. 6 Baylor (71-76)
- Oklahoma State (10-11, 3-5 Big 12) | RPI = 116: Loss at Texas A&M (61-76)
- Texas Tech (7-13, 0-8 Big 12) | RPI = 196: Loss at No. 2 Missouri (50-63)
- Iowa State (15-6, 5-3 Big 12) | RPI = 50: Win over No. 5 Kansas (72-64)
- Texas A&M (12-8, 3-5 Big 12) | RPI = 142: Win over Oklahoma State (76-61)
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Start rooting hard for OU.
If they can’t work their witchcraft against anyone else, we’ll be taking a double-shot of “bad loss” in no time.
We’re probably gonna need a pretty clean slate on the nitty-gritty sheets when the time comes.
by Itchy n Scratchy on Jan 30, 2012 12:21 PM CST reply actions
Why?
We lost to CU three times last year for Pete’s sake and still made the tourney. What I think we will find is that this league will get at least five and maybe six teams in the tourney. We just have to finish games and/or stop turning the ball over the way we have in the past six games.
The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi
by Catbacker98 on Jan 30, 2012 10:16 PM CST up reply actions
iirc CU wasn't a bad loss (3 times over) ...
But you mistake me for my brief post. I’m still optimistic about our tourney chances (I’ve posted so several times).
by Itchy n Scratchy on Jan 30, 2012 10:28 PM CST up reply actions
OU looks like a solid 6 right now in the league.
They can thank Lon Kruger for that.
The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi
by Catbacker98 on Jan 30, 2012 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
Unless OU is just that one abboration on the schedule this season
the Cats are beginning (or have all season, for that matter) to look like an average, .500 team.
Was that intentional to combine
the words “abhor” and “abberation” into “abhoration”?
Because, I like.
by 2.1 seconds left on Jan 30, 2012 8:09 PM CST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
