Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Pacquiao vs Bradley: Potential Undercard Fighters

Is the College Sports Bubble About to Burst?

One of my favorite blogs is Tom Kirkendall's Houston's Clear Thinkers.  I got started reading it when I moved to Houston for law school, because he posts about some local topics that give an outsider insight into what was, at the time, a big, scary city.  Kirkendall covers a range of topics, and to say that his posts on sports have been an inspiration for the way I post about sports on BOTC would not be inaccurate.

Yesterday, he dropped this interesting post.  I'll copy the most relevant language:

So, to the surprise of absolutely no one who follows such things, Moody’s Investors Service lowered the ratings of the already junk bond debt of about a billion dollars that the Harris County-Houston Sports Authority issued to finance construction of Reliant Stadium, MinuteMaid Park and Toyota Center

That's right.  As most of you know, cities that have pro sports teams are so desperate to keep them that they will build lavish new stadiums, like those mentioned above, at taxpayer and/or private investor expense.  And they have to do so because a city with no current pro sports team will be happy to build a lavish new stadium, at taxpayer and/or private investor expense, for any team that is unhappy with its current situation.  Just ask Seattle.

Kirkendall goes on to observe that many, if not most, professional sports franchises are not doing well financially.  He ends with this interesting, and possibly scary, thought:

So, highly-leveraged debt, a high-priced product, increasingly unprofitable operations, and intense competition from a myriad of different (and substantially cheaper) forms of entertainment.

Does anyone else think that this pro sports bubble is about to burst?

Of course, none of that mentions college sports, which is primarily what we care about here at BOTC.  However, Kirkendall's post got me thinking.  Is the college sports bubble about to burst?

Star-divide

The obvious comparison is the housing market.  Without getting too political, as we are wont to do here at BOTC, the housing market experienced a bubble wherein the value of houses increased at an unsustainable rate and, when the bubble "burst," many people found themselves owing more on their home than it was worth or locked into a mortgage contract with a variable rate that they suddenly could not afford.  That's a gross oversimplification of an extremely complex problem, but it's good enough for our purposes.

Compare that with college sports.  Every BCS school around the country is in what has been aptly described as an arms race for the best coaches and best facilities.  At places with their own U.S. Mint printing press, such as Texas and Florida and Ohio State, coaches are paid obscene salaries and athletes are treated to facilities that would make successful plaintiff's lawyers envious.  At the merely successful programs, like Georgia and Oklahoma and Nebraska, millions are spent on facilities that, functionally, have nothing to do with helping their program win games.

At the bottom are schools like K-State and Iowa State and many, many others.  Small fanbases in rural areas at schools that don't churn out large numbers of alums with high earning potential (i.e., doctors, lawyers, businessmen, some engineers, etc.).  These schools are in a fight for mere survival, trying to keep their facilities just nice enough that they can attract the recruits that the elite schools don't want and hire coaches who are, if not proven winners, promising prospects to turn their program into a winner.

But there's a problem when the operating model creates a machine that requires money, money and more money in order to sustain itself.  At some point, for whatever reason, there is no more money.  That reason could be a severe downturn in the economy.  It could be that we reach a point where there aren't enough fans willing or able to donate or buy tickets or otherwise support major college athletics.  Or it could be sudden and severe fan disinterest.  Conference realignment threatened to produce a state of affairs in which the college sports landscape was so altered that many (most?) of the fans who supported it no longer cared.  It threatens it still, as the Big 10 may find out with its tweaking of the game between Michigan and Ohio State.

College sports exhibits some of the symptoms of a bubble about to burst that Kirkendall mentions in the context of pro sports.  While college sports tend to have less debt than the cities that support their professional counterparts, college programs often take on some level of debt to fund facility enhancements.  As anyone who wants to attend a game has found out, ticket prices are high and getting higher.  One newspaper, The Oregonian, noted that Big 12 football tickets are the nation's most expensive.  College athletic programs are almost universally unprofitable; only a handful of athletic departments operate in the black.  Finally, college sports are not immune from the competition of numerous other forms of entertainment, on every level.

At some point, the bubble is going to burst.  I don't know what the triggering mechanism will be, but it doesn't take much imagination to figure one out.  It could be a very direct burst, wherein a group of schools break away from the BCS and form their own football league, leaving other schools outside the money.  Or it could be a more subtle burst.  At some point, the American consumer just doesn't have any more disposable income.  When this happens, donations stagnate and fans can't afford increasingly expensive tickets.  As a result, coaches salaries can't grow and new facilities can't be built.  It could be a shift in interest away from college athletics.  Maybe realignment sours fans on college sports like the MLB strike of 1994 did to a generation of baseball fans.  Maybe people suddenly get much more interested in NASCAR, or MMA, or some other form of entertainment that is cheaper and they find more interesting.

When it does, what is going to happen?  I don't know if any of you have bought a house lately (I haven't), but I'm going to guess it was a lot more difficult than buying a house 5-10 years ago.  You're probably going to be required to put 20 percent down.  You're probably not going to get a $300,000 loan if you make $25,000 per year.  How does that translate to college athletics?  If a burst occurs, increases in TV rights fees will flatten out.  Ticket sales and donations will fall.  As a result, schools will have to live with the facilities they have in place.  We won't see new locker rooms with iPads or X-Boxes above every locker.  Coaches won't make $5 million per year.

Or maybe I'm dead wrong about this issue and college sports is bubble-proof.  But I wouldn't bet on it.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

College sports like everything else

have been hurt by the recession. But they are not going anywhere or ultimately going to be affected much so long as the economy returns to decent growth or at least doesn’t get much worse. The system, I believe protects itself from profitable schools breaking off. Schools like Texas and Ohio State that posted profits this last year amidst most departments losing money need the rest of us to feel powerful. If we got rid of all the stupid people I would no longer seem smart lol. Kstate brought in record donations during this hard time and that is what will keep the facilities kept and new shoes on the players feet. I hear your points, but I don’t think it’s that big a worry unless we plunge into deep depression and if that happens, football will be the least of our worries.

Get ready to roll...Go Cats!

by mjk7166 on Aug 29, 2010 10:27 AM CDT reply actions  

I will never gain interest towards Nascar or MMA. Period.

And therefore you lost all credibility with me on your entire article. It’s rubbish you hear, rubbish!

/willaddmoreseriousresponselater…

Surgeon General's Warning: K-State-Mizzou basketball may increase the risk of high blood pressure. Please consult your doctor prior to watching any of these games.

by mystman995 on Aug 29, 2010 11:13 AM CDT reply actions  

Not the same

Agreeing with mjk7166. College sports exist more on emotions and sentiments than do pro sports. Even if the US economy fails, you’ll still have the Stan Kroenke’s and T. Boone’s of the world dropping buckets of cash (and tax write-offs) to prop up athletic departments. There are too many alum (whether they’re farmers or physicists) to let their beloved college get stuck wanting for too long.

That’s the fundamental difference between college and the pros in the first place – there’s a whole lot more to supporting a team that stands for something you were a part of (alum), live with (student), or support (taxpayer) than one that tries to “represent” a city/region. Free agents, mega-contracts, unions, and fire-selling owners make the pros more about the money. And that is/will/might-be their downfall.

by MizzouMonkeyBoy on Aug 29, 2010 1:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Here's hoping!

Would I get banned from SB Nation for saying a collapse in NBA, MLB and NFL salaries would be a good thing? Why does an athlete make $15M/year to play a game?

I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. - Gen. George S. Patton

by Sean T on Aug 29, 2010 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because from an economic point of view professional athletes are entertainers and paid as such. Same as rock bands and movie stars, you have a product that can be electronically reproduced an infinite number of times at near zero cost, and LOTS of buyers who are interested in buying only a relatively small number of favored artists into whom they become invested… That means you have a small number of people (U2, Brad Pitt, the Yankees) who can bring in (and threaten not to play for) enormous amounts of money, and then you have a huge number of struggling wannabes who get paid bupkiss but labor on the dream anyway.

You did ask :)

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Aug 30, 2010 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bubbles aren’t just something becoming overvalued, they operate when people see prices going up, so they buy the asset as an investment (like a house that they plan to own a short while and then sell at a profit), which in turn increases the prices, which makes it seem like an even better investment, and then you get this feedback loop which jacks prices to the point that it eventually collapses, and the stuff that everyone bought at great expense is no longer worth much.

So why are bubbles bad? To the extent that people have put a LOT of their personal value into the asset that collapses – and particularly, to the extent that the money they had in this asset was borrowed, and not even money they had to lose (i.e., it is funded by leverage), then you have a lot of people hurting really badly, because a bunch of people now have negative net worth. Which is too bad for htem, but that only really matters to anyone else if there are either so many of these people that they tank aggregate demand in the economy (i.e., nobody’s business can sell anything because too many people are broke),or the players were systematically important to the economy (i.e., the banks this time who got burned bad by the housing bubble). When those things aren’t true – e.g., the dot com bubble – a few people get burned, but life in general moves on (Krugman just wrote about this).

You can see SOME of this with college sports – there’s a race to try to outbid everyone else for coaches and facilities in the belief that htis will lead to superior financial payoff.. And maybe that will collapse, but what if it does? A few schools will be left with massively overpaid coaches a la Hawkins, and with a bit of debt from building overly fancy facilities… but so long as the athletics are a relatively small part of their overall school budget, this will be a stomach ache more than a deadly poisoning. Only where they were borrowing more money than they had as an institution in order to build a super program would te school be in any actual danger – and football programs just aren’t seen as a safe enough bet for schools to be doing that, even now. Don’t forget, in the housing bubble, people looked at the last 30 years, and saw that house prices had NEVER gone down, and so assumed that it was literally impossible to lose money on them. You could flatline, but prices would never go DOWN. And they borrowed enormously more than they were otherwise worth to make bets based on this fact.

Bottom line: College sports likely do have a small bubble, but it’s not going to kill anyone when it pops.

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Aug 29, 2010 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. - Gen. George S. Patton

by Sean T on Aug 29, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

NFL bubble may burst before 2011 season

I agree with MizzouMonkeyBoy that there is lot more loyalty to college teams than pro. The professional players are much like gypsies the way they go from team to team, and for that matter the teams themselves relocate from time to time.

Actually I think that college football may benefit greatly if there is an NFL lockout in 2011. If the economy worsens, which many think that it will, and returning veterans demand Bradford-like salaries there could quite possibly be a stalemate and no 2011 NFL season at all. Something for all of the sophomores-eligible and juniors to think about anyway. Be interesting to see how it plays out.

by SMagic on Aug 29, 2010 4:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Sweet

I do feel bad for those of us who play Fantasy Football. However, if the NFL is locked out, I suggest we figure out a way to do Big XII-2 FF for BOTC.

I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. - Gen. George S. Patton

by Sean T on Aug 29, 2010 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great read

I just want to make a point regarding those schools that do have financial backing of famous and wealthy alumni (I’m thinking T. Boone Pickens and the like).

In the general sense, schools should better act to cultivate the loyalty and appreciation of their graduates (especially their “top” grads however you want to classify that) much like they seek to do with their athletics fans – hoping for the same outcomes.

Ultimately, regardless of the size of the school, there will be alumni who become successful to a certain degree and if the schools have put in the same effort to foster and build that loyalty as they so oft do to extract money (either with tuition, fees, gym memberships and the like) then perhaps the schools could level the playing ground in terms of alumni donations.

Just like schools honor their big donors, they can promote school loyalty (however best fits their ideals) in return for the thousands of students who make smaller ‘donations’ via tuition.

Follow me on Twitter

"You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent

by rhansom on Aug 29, 2010 5:27 PM CDT reply actions  

One Word

Colorado.

Have some success. Bet the farm. Lose a few years. Can’t buyout a coach…or leave a conference.

by BlackCats on Aug 30, 2010 5:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Right, and it’s gonna suck for them for a couple more years, but then his contract will expire and everything will reset for them. In the mean time the rest of us can enjoy pencilling in W’s on our schedules ;)

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Aug 30, 2010 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Kansas State Wildcats.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Collin_klein_small
2012 Recruiting Breakdown: Offense (Part 1)
Collin_klein_small
2012 Recruiting Breakdown: JUCO's

Recent FanPosts

Collegesportsvision_avatar_small
Texas A&M Channel Guide
Fbimgp0931_small
2/2/12 Community Links day.
Willie_small
#22 K-State v. Oklahoma - 60-63 (L) - Post-Game
Collegesportsvision_avatar_small
Oklahoma Channel Guide
Willie_small
#22 K-State @ Texas Tech - 69-47 (W) - Post-Game
Willie_small
#25 K-State @ Oklahoma State - 66-58 (W) - Post-Game
Collegesportsvision_avatar_small
Oklahoma State Channel Guide
Fbimgp0931_small
Texas @ #25 K-State - 80-84 (W) - Post-Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Dsc01361_small TB

Editor

Frye_small Panjandrum

2008-8_small BracketCat

Author

Jon2c_small jonfmorse

Small Ahearn Alley