Postgame Reaction: KU
Last week, I eschewed the usual postgame reaction format because there really weren't any positives to be taken from the blowout loss to Nebraska. The same is true, but in reverse this week. There's really no reason to go through the things I liked about the game, which was pretty much everything, and the things I didn't like, which was pretty much nothing.
First of all, a lot of credit to Carson Coffman for delivering a bigtime performance last night. The overall numbers in terms of yards gained weren't eye-popping, but it's everything we could ask from Coffman and more. He had 184 yards passing on 15 completions in 16 attempts, and the only incompletion was an out-and-out drop. Add to that 42 yards rushing on 10 attempts with three touchdowns and you have a great game.
Next, the defense deserves its due for bouncing back from an embarrassing outing against Nebraska last Thursday to shut down KU's (admittedly inept) offense. After KU's first six drives in the first half, K-State had held the 'beaks to 62 total yards. Just like everyone else in purple, I would have loved to see a shutout, but there's little to complain about from the defense's effort on Thursday.
We're obviously going to miss Brodrick Smith the rest of the year, but it was good to see Chris Harper step up and make a big catch down the field on an underthrown ball, much as Smith has done several times this year. I know 184 passing yards isn't going to set anyone's world on fire, but on only 17 attempts, we'll take that output anytime this year. Props to both tight ends, Andre McDonald and Travis Tannahill, for snagging touchdown passes.
A look around the conference and at the week ahead is after the jump.
What it means and where we're going...
The best part about this victory -- aside from it being a huge blowout over an in-state rival -- is that it showed this team could bounced back from a humiliating home loss. I was concerned about this team being able to overcome hangover from the loss to Nebraska, but as it turned out that wasn't a problem. Interestingly, last night brought the news that K-State is ranked No. 22 in the first BCS standings. This was initially a surprise to me, but when you think about it, K-State is 5-1 and has played as good of a schedule as most teams at this point.
Next Saturday brings a trip to Waco to play the dreaded Baylor Bears. After beating Colorado in Boulder on Saturday, the Bears are, at 5-2, on the verge of bowl eligibility for the first time since Roosevelt was president (the first one). Not only will they be fired up to get that sixth win at home, but they're more than capable of beating K-State. Although Robert Griffin III hasn't done a ton of running this season -- he's averaging 10 attempts per game -- he will have to be accounted for or we could see him gliding through our defensive secondary. The Bears also have a lot of speed at the skill positions. We'll have more this week, but getting a win in Waco will be a challenge.
Around the Big 12
Texas 20, Nebraska 13
It was the Big 12 game of the year, and it didn't fail to deliver. Texas turned a couple early Nebraska miscues into an early lead, then played keepaway the rest of the afternoon while Nebraska constantly shot itself in the foot. It was obvious that Texas defensive coordinator Will Muschamp learned from the UCLA debacle this year, as the Longhorns smothered Nebraska's zone read, to the point where Taylor Martinez was pulled from the game in the second half in favor of Zac Lee. Nebraska didn't adjust very well, and Niles Paul and Brandon Kinnie did everything they could to ensure that no forward passes were caught for touchdowns.
Nebraska's loss opens up the North race again, at least a little bit. The Missouri/Nebraska game in Lincoln on October 30th is looming larger and larger as the showdown that will decide the North.
Burnt Orange Nation, Corn Nation
Missouri 30, Texas A&M 9
Speaking of Mizzou, the Tigers are 6-0 after hammering Texas A&M in College Station this weekend. The final doesn't really indicate how much of a blowout this was. Strange as it is to say, the Missouri defense is really something to behold this year. The Tigers don't have the playmakers on offense that we're used to seeing, but they're still holding their own. If the Tigers get past Oklahoma in Columbia this weekend, all bets are off.
Rock M Nation, I Am The 12th Man
Oklahoma 52, Iowa State 0
Didn't see any of it, and I'm glad I didn't. The Sooners are looking pretty fearsome at the moment, and are ranked No. 1 in the initial BCS standings.
Crimson and Cream Machine, Clone Chronicles
Baylor 31, Colorado 25
Again, didn't see this game. As mentioned above, Baylor is just one win shy of bowl eligibility. Meanwhile, Colorado has squandered its early-season momentum and now sits 0-2 in conference play. Our game in Boulder is looking like the most winnable conference game on the schedule.
Oklahoma State 34, Texas Tech 17
The first-year misery for Tommy Tuberville continues. Okie State jumped to an early lead in this one and never looked back. The Cowboys join Oklahoma at the top of the South at 2-0, while Texas Tech leads only A&M at the bottom of the standings.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This game
warrants compliments to Carson Coffman that have no disclaimers or back-handedness. The dude played a helluva game. Also Ku can’t be all that inept, they are televised every game.
KU converted an awful lot of 3rd downs (13/22), but that is my only complaint
Well, that and DT wasn’t allowed 2 more runs to get 100 yards for the game. Ah, well. How angry would I be if he had gotten hurt in the pursuit of a number that ultimately means little? I’m still waiting for an encore of his dominating performances against UCLA and ISU.
Good for UT. I’m always happy to see NU lose, and to lose at home to UT, after all the talking NU fans had been doing for 10 months, I’m delighted.
Baylor scares me, a lot. I wonder if the TV people are regretting having the pillow-fight-of-the-week on TV (A&M vs KU) instead of KSU vs Baylor?
I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. - Gen. George S. Patton
Not to mention
That NU fans recently began dismissing the UT game, saying that it wasn’t even going to be close.
That’s what arrogance gets you, and NU has it in spades.
by ChrisP Wildcat on Oct 18, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions
I love the use of the word "eschewed" here. Well done!
And, yeah, Baylor is scary as hell!
"Face it, sports are the window through which the university is viewed."
--Pres. Jon Wefald, Kansas State University
by K. Scott Bailey on Oct 18, 2010 10:08 AM CDT reply actions
Eschew obfuscation
as I like to say…
'Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.' --Jim Halpert
In specie, those of a supererogatory essentiality.
My new blog: Those Other Guys. Critiques welcome.
I'm glad Baylor won this weekend
so they are confident, maybe overconfident. They are good but not that good. Remember that a pretty mediocre Tech team beat them in a shootout and the CU game was very close most of the way. We should be able to move the ball on them pretty easily. The question is can we stop a mobile quarterback…I hope the lesson is learned well and we can. Keep Griffin from running the ball and I think we will win. Our pass D is good enough to hang with their receivers. Hope for no let down after a KU blowout.
Bitchslapping Texas since 1997
Not to mention
we beat KU by more points than they did, so obviously we are better!
by ChrisP Wildcat on Oct 18, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, and if we played Nebraska, we'd beat them by 38! :)
"Face it, sports are the window through which the university is viewed."
--Pres. Jon Wefald, Kansas State University
by K. Scott Bailey on Oct 18, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions
So is ESPN going to use the BCS?
In prior years, when the BCS poll came out they stopped using the coach’s poll to decide who to show highlights of. Are they going to do this again? Does anyone remember if they only go down to 15 or 20 or use the whole 25?
NU could have chose to lay an egg a week earlier in Manhattan.
Perhaps they thought themselves world beaters after Thursday night. They just looked downright slow in comparison to our game. And Texas is still not that good on offense. What was really puzzling was how NU attempted to get Helu going early instead of Martinez. It really made me scratch my head. I now think Mizzou will win the North but time will tell.
I just think it would be funny,
if the Cats get hot, go 5-1 to finish the year, and finish ahead of Nub in the Big 12 North standings. How much would THAT chap the Shucker fans?!?
"Face it, sports are the window through which the university is viewed."
--Pres. Jon Wefald, Kansas State University
by K. Scott Bailey on Oct 18, 2010 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Not just funny,
it would be miraculous. First things first: try beating a tough Baylor squad that needs just one more win to be bowl-eligible for the first time since 1995. Oh, and do it on the road in someplace other than Lawrence.
Nebraska leaves the Big-12 the same way they started in it: unable to beat Texas. Maybe Cornhusker Nation shouldn’t have talked so much smack all year, and maybe Bo Pelini shouldn’t have whined so incessantly about a (correct) reset of the play clock to 1 second in the Big-12 championship game.
Oh, for sure.
I don’t think 10-2, 6-2 is going to happen. I’d settle for 8-4 or probably even 7-5. I just think it would be hilarious for the Shuckers to be in third place in the division on their way out the door!
"Face it, sports are the window through which the university is viewed."
--Pres. Jon Wefald, Kansas State University
by K. Scott Bailey on Oct 18, 2010 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Darn straight
It would be beautiful. When they weren’t being whiny about the (correct) one-second reset and their annual loss to Texas, Cornhusker Nation was busy heaping scorn on the Big-12 as a conference. Funny how Husker fans all seem so sure the Big-12 just can’t possibly continue to exist without Nebraska in it.
never a bad day when we beat KU
last year’s highpoint was beating KU at home and getting the Governor’s Cup back in its rightful place. I don’t think (I hope we haven’t) seen the season’s highpoint yet. I think Baylor will give us fits but that the game is winnable. I think Daniel Thomas is due for another big game and it may end up looking and feeling a lot more like the Iowa State game.
Did anyone else notice
how the announcers were bitching for Nebraska the whole game as if they were being screwed? There were some iffy calls, but they went both ways. It was pissing me off!
Bitchslapping Texas since 1997
I noticed this as well.
Does the NCAA do anything about the announcers talking bad about the officials? I remember seeing a game earlier this year where they were openly criticizing the refs worse than this game (can’t remember which game it was though).
Hail to the Purple, Hail to the White
Wildcat in spirit, Wildcat in fight
Hail Alma Mater from sea to sea
Onward forever, Hail Victory!
So are you telling me with the new BCS ranking and Robert Griffin et..
al that ESPN 360 still cant pick up this game…it is unfathomable that this sort of game does not appear somewhere in this crazy cyberspace world
Nope, we get to see A&M against KU!
I’m pretty sure if you played that in a prison you would get complaints about cruel and unusual punishment. Damned TV execs! A&M sucks, get over it!
I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. - Gen. George S. Patton
Someone mentioned that showing the KU/aTm game is all about getting everyone some TV time.
Something about there needing to be a set minimum that each team appears on television.
"Face it, sports are the window through which the university is viewed."
--Pres. Jon Wefald, Kansas State University
by K. Scott Bailey on Oct 18, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions
That's not the case, though
Texas A&M is on TV because they will bring in more viewers than will Baylor.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
by TB on Oct 18, 2010 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Interesting
So, if KU goes 1-11, 0-8 this year, there’s no minimum for the times they would have to be on TV for next year? Wouldn’t that mean that — technically — they might have ZERO appearance in ’11?
"Face it, sports are the window through which the university is viewed."
--Pres. Jon Wefald, Kansas State University
by K. Scott Bailey on Oct 18, 2010 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Theoretically, yes...
…but remember, they will play Texas and OU next year, thereby guaranteeing they’ll be on at least twice.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
by TB on Oct 18, 2010 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Keitz mentioned on his show
that there might be some ass-kissing going on here due the threats to go to the SEC by A&M.
Kansas is just awful at football again. I love it.
Also, if the team plays a complete game like that against Baylor, I like their chances. Need to avoid turnovers as much as possible on Saturday.
But, really, just enjoyed the heck out of that ballgame Thursday night.
"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton
Just to make KU look bad,
I actually saw that damn “Frank Martin mows my lawn” T-shirt on Thursday.
I didn’t actually pay attention to see how many idiots wore that, but it still pissed me off.
screw this, I should be sleeping anyway.














