It used to be that these media days were kind of semi-formal affairs. I remember that many teams came dressed to the nines when they arrived.
The only team that came dressed in their coats and ties were the Kansas State Wildcats. They might reconsider in the future -- or at least let the players show a little originality and not come dressed in the same suits with the Powercat logo on the chest.
Is there something wrong with looking like a team?
almost 3 years ago
TB
10 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I don't understand Griffin at all.
Why is this a problem? These kids represent out university and if Bill wants them to look sharp and look like a team, it’s fine by me.
Hey Tim – I’m all for being original, but the last time I checked there was still no “I” in team.
Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!
If Baylor did it
He’d be totally down. It seems like he is having a bromance with them at the moment.
Simple math
Individuality = Prince
Team Unity = Snyder
Which approach has produced a higher winning percentage and more “consistently competed for championships?” End of argument.
The thing is that Bill Snyder doesn't do anything without putting some thought behind it...
I can’t find any evidence of this, but I remember watching a documentary of Vince Lombardi, and it said that when he took over the Packers, the team was to wear suits in public. He did it to create a culture of unity and professionalism.
Bill Snyder did that too. There are other things he did as well. The team got new uniforms, they got new practice gear, and they got a new logo. Snyder couldn’t control how talented his first team was, but he could control how his team conducted itself in all areas outside of the white lines. Sometimes, that’s where you begin to change what happens on the field too. Making symbolic changes like requiring your players to look like professional men during a media day might seem insignificant to a reporter, but this is all a part of what the textbooks like to call ‘transformational leadership’. Changing the culture of a football program isn’t going from A to B. It’s going from A to Z and all points in between.
I have no issues with Tim Griffin, but I do have issues with that remark. Individuality doesn’t come with wearing a hat or a Nike polo shirt. It doesn’t come with earrings, dreadlocks, or anything of that sort. As someone that works in the corporate world, where a suit and tie is required attire at a great many functions, I can say, with 100% certainty, that you can display originality while wearing a blazer and a tie, and it generally comes with the content of your character.
Bill Snyder cares about details. All details. Some folks may think it’s eccentricity or totalitarian behavior, but I don’t seem to find anything odd about it. I find it odd that grown professionals look down on wearing a suit and tie. Just like I find it odd that I go to weddings or other functions nowadays, and I have to tie a tie for a family member or acquaintance who should know how to do it and do it right.
I’m glad that our players represented themselves like this. I’m not trying to be a fuddyduddy, but as a 28 year-old-man, with five years of corporate life beneath my belt, one thing I notice about way too many college graduates today is a horrible lack of professionalism. One thing that Snyder has always prided himself on was teaching these guys to be successful off of the field as well, and I’m glad our players now understand how men conduct themselves.
I’m sorry about the rant, but one of my greatest pet peeves is listening to people bitch about wearing a suit and tie. I don’t want to get all Barney Stinson about it, but no one should ever be looked down upon for wearing a suit. That’s just ridiculous.
Bring on the Cats
"Without getting into specifics, my exit involves a McFlurry machine and a video tape of risque commercials from overseas." -- Jack Donaghy
by Panjandrum on Aug 1, 2009 10:42 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Agreed...
…and on the subject of “originality,” it’s not like every college student has his own suit and tie. They should, but a lot don’t. They probably appreciate the opportunity to wear the one provided by the athletic department, and having our guys look sharp is one athletic department expense I’m completely OK with.
It just struck me as an odd comment from Griffin. He seemed to be saying that it was nice to see a team show up in suits and ties, but then it turned into a backhanded compliment when he criticized the choice of attire. I mean, if they were double-breasted or committed some other hideous fashion faux pas, by all means, tell me what you want to see. But the fact that they were all wearing the same suit doesn’t seem to be a problem to me.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
by TB on Aug 2, 2009 11:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah...
Griffin waxing nostalgic made me read his comments twice. Very ambiguous if you ask me. For the big word trifecta: antidisestablishmentarianism.
Hail to the Purple, Hail to the White
Wildcat in spirit, Wildcat in fight
Hail Alma Mater from sea to sea
Onward forever, Hail Victory!
+1
Well said. Bravo. My senitments exactly.
Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!
Ugh, reply fail
Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!













