Bring On The Cats: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

Postgame Reaction: Colorado

Maybe?

As the seconds ticked away yesterday afternoon at Bill's House, that was the thought that started to creep into my head.  Despite my cynical and hasty prediction -- and everyone else's, I may add -- two weeks ago that we were out of the North Division race, none other than your Kansas State Wildcats stand, alone, atop the standings halfway through the conference season.

That said, it's a little early to make travel plans for Dallas just yet, although you can rest assured I will be at Jerry's House should we somehow emerge from the tangle.  It's too early because this team is not the dominating juggernaut that could handle games against the likes of OU, KU, Mizzou and Nebraska like it did back in the early 2000s, but there are reasons to hope this fine Sunday afternoon.  While the schedule likely does get a little more difficult in the final four-game stretch, how much more difficult is it really?  Oklahoma has been written off as a loss since the beginning of the season, and as long as we don't play another "Tech" game down there, I'll be OK.  Then we have home games against KU and MU.  Does anybody really fear KU at this point?  They are entirely capable of beating K-State, I admit, but it's not a foregone conclusion like it was before the year.  And Mizzou is playing with a one-legged quarterback.  I know an injury is supposed to heal over time, but that's only if it's rested and protected.  As long as Blaine Gabbert keeps playing, he's going to have to run, push off it to throw, and have defenders fall on it.  That's not going to be conducive to healing.  Then, of course, the finale is a trip to Lincoln to face Nebraska.  Despite losing at home to ISU yesterday -- who suddenly doesn't look like such a slouch, either -- I'm not ready to count the Huskers out, but in keeping with the theme thus far, they're eminently more beatable now than they looked, say, two or three weeks ago.

Anyway, that's a topic that we shall expand upon this week.  For now, let's turn our attention to yesterday's game.

What I liked...

...taking the early momentum.  This team needs confidence early each and every game, and it got it yesterday.  The first drive stalled and resulted in only a field goal, but it was points on the board and solid ball movement.

...the reformation of Josh Cherry.  It's like the light has switched on for this kid.  Granted, he's probably not going to bang home many 50-yarders, but as long as he can put it through the uprights from 25-35 consistently, he'll be doing his job.

...big Daniel Thomas chewing up yards.  Twenty carries resulted in 145 rushing yards, easily the best offensive performance of the day.

...a stout defensive performance after Colorado's first-drive touchdown.  After the first drive, I was worried, thinking back to last year's defensive implosions.  I should have known better with this coaching staff.  Time and time again, the defense answered the bell yesterday, stifling the Buffs even when the offense wasn't holding up its end of the bargain.

What I didn't like...

...doing nothing on offense in the second half.  In defense of Grant Gregory and the offensive unit, it was a lot windier yesterday than it probably seemed on TV.  The flags at the top of the stadium were constantly flapping hard toward the North, meaning any drive headed toward the south end zone was an adventure.  Still, we're going to play on a lot of windy days, and we still have to find a way to move the ball.  I'd like to lay some of the blame for the second half stall on the coaching staff, because it seemed like we just wanted to get the hell out of Dodge with the victory, but they gave the offense chances to open it up and they resulted in mistakes.

...giving Tyler Hansen hours to throw the ball, then not making tackles when the protection finaly broke down.  It was nice to pick up four more sacks, but we could have had at least two more.  Our defensive secondary did an oustanding job blanketing the field, forcing Hansen to hold the ball a long time.  He proved to be a slippery sonofabitch back there, although the defensive line got better at finishing plays as the game went along.

...not protecting Grant Gregory very well.  Very rarely could Gregory drop back, survey the field, check down a receiver or two, and then deliver the ball.  Most of the time, before he could even read his first receiver on anything other than a very quick pass, he had a defendar already in his face.  Our passing game has to improve against the four teams in our stretch run, and it starts up front.

Click the jump for more!

Star-divide

What it means and where we're going...

As mentioned, it means we stand in sole possession of the division lead halfway through our conference slate.  Feels nice to say that.  Of course, they don't hand out trophies for leading the division after four games, so improvement needs to continue down the stretch.

Next week, we travel to Norman, Okla., to face the Oklahoma Sooners.  As you're all aware, the Sooners are 4-3 on this year, although they're eight points away from being 7-0, and all three losses came against varyingly competent teams (BYU --> Miami --> Texas).  Last week, against undoubtedly their weakest competition of the year, they hammered KU in Lawrence.  I know confidence is running at an all-time high around these parts, but winning in Norman will be the tallest task this team has faced this year.

Previous Opponent Roundup

Massachusetts lost, 34-12, to Richmond yesterday in sloppy game (weather and otherwise).  Apparently, UMass was trying to imitate Nebraska, as it turned the ball over seven times.

Louisiana took one on the chin at home, losing 51-29 to Florida Atlantic.  The Ragin' Cajuns are now 4-3, 2-1 in Sun Belt play.

UCLA lost to Arizona, 27-13.  The loss drops the Bruins below .500 (3-4), and they remain winless in Pac-10 play.

Nobody cares about Tennessee Tech.

See below for recaps of Iowa State, Texas Tech, and Texas A&M.

Big 12 Conference Roundup

Iowa State 9, Nebraska 7

No, that's not a misprint.  Without Austen Arnaud or Alexander Robinson, the Cyclones strode out of Lincoln with a victory yesterday.  While I can't fault the Nebraska defense -- it's incredible that they only allowed nine points when the offense had eight turnovers -- the Nebraska offense is ghastly right now.  Roy Helu is hurt, Zac Lee has no confidence with 1.8 million red-clad football geniuses calling for Cody Green to play, and the receivers can't catch the ball.  That's a really bad combination.

This game really throws the North into chaos, as it establishes Iowa State, at 2-2, as a potential division contender.  Nebraska falls to 1-2, and has looked like dog dung in its most of its conference action this year.  Think about it: three bad quarters against Missouri, four bad quarters against Texas Tech, and at least three bad quarters yesterday.  If not for a fourth-quarter Mizzou meltdown in Columbia, the 'skerz would be 0-3 and Bo Pelini would really be on the run up north.  Nebraska gets a chance to calm the waters this weekend as they travel to Waco to face hapless Baylor, while Iowa State travels to College Station to face bipolar Texas A&M.

For more: Clone Chronicles, Corn Nation

Oklahoma 35, KU 13

The outcome of this game was never really in doubt.  Todd Reesing threw three interceptions in the first 20 minutes of the game en route to a 14-0 OU lead.  Credit to KU's defense for making a bit of a stand in the second quarter to hold the halftime deficit to 21-6, but Oklahoma slammed the door on any visions of a comeback that may have been dancing in KU's head with a quick touchdown to start the second half.

This game did two things, in my mind.  First, it served notice that Oklahoma will not mail the season in, and that while they may have lost some games early, they will not lose games to marginal conference competition.  Second, it put another dagger in the History Awaits campaign.  Now, barring the wackiest of tiebreakers, we can write KU out of the division race if it loses to bipolar Texas Tech in Lubbock next week.  As we all know, Oklahoma returns home to face K-State in Norman on Halloween.

For more: Crimson and Cream Machine, Rock Chalk Talk

Oklahoma State 34, Baylor 7

Ho-hum, the Cowboys traveled to Waco and dispatched punchless Baylor with ease, not allowing a score until a meaningless touchdown with seven minutes to go.  There's not much to say about this one, as OSU dominated in every phase of the game.  Zac Robinson was outstanding, completing 23 of 27 passes for 250 yards and three TDs, with no INTs.

Perhaps the most meaningless game of the day, this one did nothing to change any perception of either division race.  It does set up a big showdown in Stillwater next weekend, as the Pokes "welcome" Texas for a showdown of teams who are undefeated in conference play.  Meanwhile, Baylor gets to play the role of the bounceback girl for Nebraska.

Texas A&M 52, Texas Tech 30

In the "What the fuck?!" moment of the day, the Aggies turned the tables on every notion of common sense by beating Texas Tech in Lubbock.  Strike that, not only did A&M beat Tech, they pretty much dominated.  Both teams rolled up yards by the dozen, but only A&M could conver that to points.  With Sticks Sheffield hurt, Tech reverted to Taylor Potts, who responded by throwing for 400+ yards and two costly interceptions.  Meanwhile, the Texas Tech defense that had looked so stout against Big 12 competition thus far mysteriously disappeared, allowing 34 first downs, 559 total yards, and 322 rushing yards (not a misprint).  Remember, this was an A&M team that was held to negative rushing yards last week by K-State.

While this game did nothing to change much in the South division race -- it's pretty clearly UT and Oklahoma State at this point -- it provided Texas A&M partisans with some much needed bragging rights in this rivalry.  It prevented Tech from notching a fourth-straight triumph in the series, and was probably pretty satisfying for Mike Sherman after the war of words he and Mike Leach engaged in last season.

For more: I Am The 12th Man, Double T Nation

Texas 41, Missouri 7

Again, there's not much to say about this one.  Texas led by three scores before the first quarter ended, and Missouri put up nothing resembling a fight.  Maybe the other half of the Unholy Alliance can help me out with this one, but I have no idea how long it's been since Mizzou was held below 200 total yards for a game.  Colt McCoy did pretty much anything he wanted, Blaine Gabbert still looks like a circus sideshow limping around on one leg, and the Mizzou just generally looked like it was stuck in second gear last night while Texas was blasting down the Autobahn at 100+ mph.

Hard to say what this one means for either division race.  The result was expected, although Mizzou's utter ineptness may not have been.  While Texas is a huge step up in class from anyone in the North, it's clear that Mizzou needs Gabbert to get healthy and needs its defense to come together (they showed Carl Gettis yelling at and then walking away from one of his assistant coaches on TV last night) to have any shot down the stretch.

For more: Burnt Orange Nation, Rock M Nation

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Bring On The Cats

Big 12 Tournament Reaction

Mar 2010 by TB - 15 comments

Postgame Reaction: KU and Iowa State

Mar 2010 by TB - 11 comments

Postgame Reaction: Mizzou

Feb 2010 by TB - 15 comments

Two-Week Basketball Roundup

Feb 2010 by TB - 10 comments

A Late Recap of Last Week's Action

Feb 2010 by TB - 7 comments

Comments

Display:

To answer your question

From the Columbia Tribune’s Dave Matter:

Missouri’s 173 yards against Texas marked the most feeble offensive output of the Pinkel era. The last time MU had fewer yards? The 66-0 loss at Kansas State in the 1999 season finale, when the Tigers managed just 116 yards. Since the birth of the Big 12, the only other team to hold MU to less than 180 yards of offense was Nebraska: 174 in 1999, 166 in 1998 and 170 in 1996.

by RPT on Oct 25, 2009 4:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I swear...he did not ask that question expecting this response.

If he did, that was just mean. MEAN.

Bad TB. Bad blogger. Bad.

Bring on the Cats
"Without getting into specifics, my exit involves a McFlurry machine and a video tape of risque commercials from overseas." -- Jack Donaghy

by Panjandrum on Oct 25, 2009 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I truly had no idea that was the answer

I now feel very bad and will walk myself to timeout.

We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats

by TB on Oct 25, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The flags at the top of the stadium were constantly flapping hard toward the North, meaning any drive headed toward the south end zone was an adventure

So that’s the reason why Cody Hawkins’ throws were wobblely as hell. No? Yeah I didn’t think so either….

Introducing the new 2008 Big 12 Football Champions: OU, UT*, TT*, and MU*!
Now Introducing the new 2009 Big 12 Baseball Tournament Champions: UT, KSU*, BU*, and MU*!

by mystman995 on Oct 25, 2009 7:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Did anyone else...

notice the cheers from the K-State fans when Cody Hawkins was announced as quarterback? Good call Dan.

by Catfan33 on Oct 26, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm still not sure...

how to feel about this team. Are we as bad as the kicking TT put on us…obviously no. Are we as good as the kicking we put on aTm….again, obviously no. But I’m not sure where they’re at relative to those two games. The defense looks like they’re finally finding their groove. As one of you put it before the season began, it’s criminal how much better the coaching is on that side of the ball. The offense, while not bad, is inconsistent at best. My gut is telling me that these kids are finally buying into what Snyder is selling. The talent was always there to be a decent to good football team, they just needed the proper coaching and direction to get there. Next week is going to be my barometer on this team. I’m writing it off as a loss, as we still don’t have the talent to beat a team like OU, but as long as we keep it respectable and show some improvement and consistency, I’ll be happy. If this team plays at least to its potential, two more wins at home are not out of the question. If the coaching staff gets these kids to play above that, three more wins are definitely possible. The north is so wide open at this point, that I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Snyder gets these guys into the championship game. At this point, I’m giving the conference coach of the year trophy to Snyder for getting essentially the same team that Prince had to play good football.

by Catfan33 on Oct 26, 2009 10:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree, but...

remember that this CU team put up 34 points on KU. I know their defense if not good, but I think it shows that ours is QUITE GOOD now and improving weekly. Unless OU puts up a ton on us saturday, then I won’t know what to think. I don’t think it will happen. In fact we might just hang with them if Thomas can put up some decent numbers. I guess what i’m saying is if we continue to play well and improve, 5-3 is the worst we will do with home wins over KU and MU. Remember even losing this week we still are in 1st in the north for another week no matter what! We have nothing to lose Saturday and if we can pull it off, no question we in the north I think. Makes for a fun game :)

Wildcat for life

by mjk7166 on Oct 26, 2009 11:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If they can put up another...

impressive defensive game, I’ll be a believer. Dan Hawkins is a crappy coach and winning against him is not all that impressive. Same goes for aTm even with their win over TT. Jesus Christ this is a screwy conference. One thing is for certain though. At this point, we have an easier road to win the North division than the other teams given their upcoming schedules and losses up to this point. I just don’t think we have near the talent to hang with OU, or to beat KU, MU, and NU if they’re healthy and playing to their potential. However, Snyder’s coaching definitely offsets some of the talent gap and KU, MU, and NU are not healthy, have exposed weaknesses, and are not playing well. Like I said earlier, as long as we put up a good fight against OU and don’t replay the TT game, I like our chances right now against the other three. Snyder could squeeze potential out of a 150 pound, potato chip eating, video game playing 10 year old. He’s got these kids in the right mindset and is doing a hell of job coaching with what he’s got. I was highly critical of Snyder coming back, but in retrospect, I’m beginning to think he was the only one to get this program going in the right direction again.

by Catfan33 on Oct 26, 2009 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

MU is 0-3

KU and NU are 1-2.

I really think you are overrating those teams a bit. Records don’t lie, but preseason hype sure does.

I said to many people back in August, and especially after the Louisiana and UCLA losses, that I could see this team losing those games but going 3-0 in November.

Why?

Because BILL SNYDER’S TEAMS ALWAYS IMPROVE.

They haven’t proven me wrong yet.

by BracketCat on Oct 26, 2009 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you...

I think they are overrated. They all had tons of preseason potential, but that doesn’t mean shit unless it translates on the field. I don’t think our talent level across the board is even with them, but they’re all playing like crap and all have glaring weaknesses. So that evens the field. And I really agree with the improvement. I made a comment earlier in the season that it wouldn’t surprise me if Snyder was able to make improvements as the season rolled along, and field a team drastically different than what we saw in September. His teams have always been notoriously slow starters but almost unstoppable once they got rolling.

by Catfan33 on Oct 27, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Kansas State Wildcats.
Start posting about the Wildcats »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
651883037_small
Manhattan A Possible Destination For Former National #1 Recruit?
Small
NCAA 1st Rnd Channel Guide
Sptb
K-State Baseball Home Opener
Frye_small
K-State and Frank Martin Agree to Contract Extension
Small
Locations Showing Iowa State Game
Small
Iowa State Channel Guide
Kstex-logo_small
Who is K-State's greatest Trillionaire?
Catbreathe_small
Arthur Brown is ours now
Small
Hammer and Rails is trying to sort out the #1 seeds

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Maryland's Greivis Vasquez, of Venezuela, tries to block a shot by Houston's Aubrey Coleman in the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Friday, March 19, 2010. (AP Photo/Rajah Bose)

NCAA Tournament: After Early Struggles, Maryland Puts Away Houston, 89-77

Michigan State's Kalin Lucas drives around New Mexico State's Jonathan Gibson in the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Spokane, Wash., Friday, March 19, 2010. (AP Photo/Don Ryan)

Lane Violation Helps Michigan State Move Past New Mexico State, 70-67

Oklahoma State's James Anderson (23) is defended by Georgia Tech's Glen Rice, Jr. (14), in the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Milwaukee, Friday, March 19, 2010.(AP Photo/Morry Gash)

Georgia Tech Remembers How To Shoot Free Throws, Tops Oklahoma St. 64-59

More from SBNation.com >


Manager

Dsc01361_small TB

Frye_small Panjandrum

Editors

Touchdown_frank_small EMAW

2008-8_small BracketCat

Official Partner of CBS Sports